requestId:68499aba1d21d0.82831859.
Chinese Philosophy cannot face Liang Shuming’s inheritance
Author: Ding Yun (Teacher from the School of Philosophy of the Dalian School of Science and Technology, and editor of “Thinking and Society”)
Source: “Three-Contact Life Weekly” Issue 27, 2018
Time: Confucius was in the 2569th year of Wuxu Puyue, Guimao
Bao Stories Jesus July 10, 2018
Three-Contact Career Weekly: Liang Shuming wrote an article “About the Yuan Dynasty’s doubts”, which reads people with relish and relish the story of Cai Yuanpei’s recruitment as a teacher in his middle school. People often use this to explain Cai Yuanpei’s “exploration” or Liang Shuming’s “natural power”. Where is the “talent” that Liang Shuming showed in his early years? Judging from the teaching landscape, Liang Shuming was not systematic in any middle school or western school training. Where did his academic questions and insights come from?
Ding Yun:This matter is very rare. Liang Shuming actually suits Cai Yuanpei’s request. Cai’s “opening up the love life” is true, and “smart” is even more true. He was the first to take charge of the north, and since he did not want to rely on the old academic discipline, the author had been logically copied? The teachers who come here cannot learn from the middle school without saying anything. Hu Xingzhi, a major figure who uses Oriental Philosophy as a model to clean up Chinese thinking and has “system training” has not yet graduated from China, so Cai can only learn from a new perspective in this country. Indian philosophical talents are still short of tomorrow. When I learn to search for scenery from Buddhism, I can also talk about it without any discussion. Originally, Liang Shuming and his Indian philosophy were just a good talk for Cai Yuanpei. What he really relies on is Dr. Hu Yingxiong and Western Studies. Liang Shuming was definitely a new figure who brought Western learning circles under the guidance of some of the Northern Teachers who were still alive and left the smell of late Qing Dynasty.
In June 1918, a group photo from the Beijing Major Science and Technology School. The fifth person from the left in the front row is Peking University president Cai Yuanpei, the sixth person is science president Chen Hengxiu, and the seventh person is Liang Shuming
The “Abstract of the Yuan Dynasty” shows that this 24-year-old author is familiar with Chinese teaching books, can read English and Western literature, can use Western theory to discuss Buddhism, and analyze it in depth and detail. Among the younger generation who received teaching in China at that time, it was considered to be a good student of both Chinese and Western learning. It is very rare to understand that at that time, most graduates were providing online car and horse fees, let alone “mass”. Liang Shuming was born in Xinxuetang and has been studying English since childhood. It is quite good to have “Western Education Training”. Those who “school training” form a system often stick to the old, which is not what Cai wants to prosper.
Liang Shuming’s own performance in Buddhist cultivation can also be said to be premature. “Survey of the Yuan Dynasty” is a work that explores Buddhist principles. Specifically, it is divided into two articles: “Buddhist Sutra” (i.e. “Surprise Yuan”) and “Buddhist Convenience” (i.e. “Suspect”). Buddhist articles are no more than others. They need to be written in a reasonable and solid manner, which is actually very difficult. First of all, Buddhism is not a Buddhist, but a Buddhist is based on academic practice rather than religion. Otherwise, it would be difficult to convince those who are still untrue.
SecondlyInsisting emotionsBuddhism is not ordinary philosophy or science, but it must also have some personal practice, otherwise it may become a historical examination or a conceptual discussion. There are many celebrities who like to talk about Buddhism at first, but they often either talk about it like Liang Qichao or make it like Zhang Taiyan. Liang Shuming said frankly in his late years that these two people who studied Buddhism did not really understand Buddhism. As for Hu Yi, it can be said that he was always separated from Buddhism; and the mythology and examinations were not his elders. One day, Song Wei finally remembered that he was the chief of her in high school, and she was at the beginning. It is actually rare to see Buddhist articles like the “Suo” that are both detailed and pure, and can be compared with Western learning. Cai Yuanpei was born in a former Hanlin area in the Qing Dynasty and studied philosophy in Europe and the United States. It can be said that both Chinese and Western studies have “system training”. Can he improve Liang’s family and the United States?
Liang Shuming has been good at learning by himself since he was a child. Only those who are good at learning can make decisions, make decisions, increase their learning ability, and have insights. Those who are interested in learning and want to learn Western learning may have some questions. It is difficult to get insights, and they are barking and barking, and they dare not be special. Hu’s training is more like Chen Yinke’s regular rules, but the result is difficult to see the back of the situation. Because of Chen’s view, it is absolutely unfair.博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官� href=”https://twsugarhoney520.org/”>Baoculture Methods to cultivate insight, thinking and willingness.
Liang Shuming and all traditional thinkers who have cultivated and satisfied themselves, besides reading independently, they are all able to observe the world’s situation and reflect on themselves. The body practices and thinking are related. “Academic training” is a must-have; only when conditions are lacking, you can still refine it yourself. And insight, perception and thinking are not just plain “Academic training”.
Three-Contact Life Weekly:How will you understand Chinese knowledge in modern times Is it positioned Liang Shuming in Zi’s connotation? From the perspective of Neo-Confucianism, some people mentioned him with Xiong Shili, Rong Youlan, etc.; from the perspective of physical strength to look for the modern path of China, some people mentioned him with Huang Yanpei, Yan Yangchu, etc.; Ai Chang also compared Liang Shuming to “China’s Gandhi”… Who do you think is a person who can refer to Liang Shuming?
Ding Yun: Liang Shuming once learned the complex itself: he is not a student, but a person who is a student. This is both false and proud. In fact, learning questions are difficult to completely separate. Only learning questions are refined and detailed. Exquisite learning questions must be self-restricted, and not directly touched. Big problems. People who are caught by big problems may not have no learning, but their interest is not to carefully polish their learning through academic methods; they cannot present their learning questions in a detailed and appropriate academic discipline.
Liang Dao is a very thoughtful and unconventional situation. His works left by , the body is divided into four categories. The first category is pure academic works, such as “An Overview of Indian Philosophy” and “Only Ideology”; the second category is systematic commentary on major problems, which can also be said to be “thinking” works, such as “Interesting Civilization and Its Philosophy”, “Essentials of Chinese Civilization”, “Human Heart and Life”, etc.; the third category is the literature on actual politics, including the great The latter, such as “Country Construction Theory”, is actually a contemplative work, but it is more of a “theoretical foundation” of actual political actions; the last one is a discussion and record of its own learning, physical education and kung fu. Although it is also related to classics, it cannot be considered pure academic research works, such as “Morning Talk” and “Two Serious Interpretations of the Two Masters of the Gifts”.
To explain Liang Shuming more vividly, you must seize the big problems in his life, and at the same time pay attention to his way of entering these problems. Liang’s first work is relatively simple and has its own system, but lacks expert onesOn the way to study, I met a familiar neighbor, and said hello, “How can Xiaowei be so detailed and complex? Liang said that he is not a scholar, but refers to this level. His fourth type of work is actually extremely subtle and r
發佈留言